Space is not a vacuum
Scientists are wrong about the state of space
Space is not a vacuum. Vacuum is a state of negative pressure relative to another environment. Space is zero pressure, or neutral pressure. In some areas of the universe, it can be slightly pressured by the large existence of matter, but it cannot be more than one psi. If space were a vacuum, it would have sucked the atmosphere out, and the Earth would be just a pile of rocks without water.
The reason for that is:
Because we live on Earth in a pressurized environment, it doesn't mean anything outside of Earth is a vacuum. If it were, it would have sucked all the atmosphere from us and naturalized it. The atmospheric pressure at sea level is approximately 1 bar or 14.7 psi. Our body's internal pressure is also 14.7 psi. This means our body produces equal pressure to counter the atmospheric pressure on the body. Remember when we climb a mountain or fly at high altitude and have to yawn to adjust to the internal pressure, and suddenly feel the pressure is released from our eardrums.
This is from the internet (Wikipedia) about the state of vacuum in quantum physics:
In quantum field theory, the quantum vacuum state (also called the quantum vacuum or vacuum state) is the quantum state with the lowest possible energy. Generally, it contains no physical particles. However, the quantum vacuum is not a simple empty space, but instead contains fleeting electromagnetic waves and particles that pop into and out of the quantum field.
Do we and the environment we live in are considered as a vacuum to the marine life because they live in a pressurized environment? Outside the atmosphere and the environment in which we live, scientists regard the space around us as a vacuum. The International Space Station (ISS) orbits at a distance of only 380 kilometers, and according to this definition, we consider it a vacuum state. Molecules of oxygen are found as far as 3,000 kilometers outside our atmosphere, and there are large amounts of other particles and energy that exist beyond our planet. Yet again, we still refer to it as a vacuum because it is easier to use a wrong description of a place's state than the actual state.
If light exists in space, so does energy. Light carries photons, and photons are packets of energy. According to the definition, if the energy exists, then there is no vacuum. There is a large amount of energy and particles invisible to the naked eye that exist in space, and writing it off as non-existent and a vacuum is simply incorrect.


Well, got it from Wikipedia, will add the link
But trump’s head is!